They def hooked up and that's what made me dislike her. Why try so hard to deny it...
everybody who says they see people throwing missions for family have a lot of faith in these peoples character. more often than not, you see families battle it out for inheritance when someone dies and families are torn apart sadly. Do I think some people will value family over money? Of course. But I do not put it past a few people...especially those who may have a sibling rivalry and want to see who's ultimately "better"
I doubt anyone of these people would screw over a family member on these challenges. It's not worth it really when you think about it.
But then again with some of these people I can see your point.
They def hooked up and that's what made me dislike her. Why try so hard to deny it...
everybody who says they see people throwing missions for family have a lot of faith in these peoples character. more often than not, you see families battle it out for inheritance when someone dies and families are torn apart sadly. Do I think some people will value family over money? Of course. But I do not put it past a few people...especially those who may have a sibling rivalry and want to see who's ultimately "better"
I doubt anyone of these people would screw over a family member on these challenges. It's not worth it really when you think about it.
But then again with some of these people I can see your point.
I think it could go half and half...some of them will be willing to lose to let the 'actual' cast member from RW/RR/FM/A*** win to possibly help them stay longer so they are more relevant and can get cast again, and I could see some actually battling if they don't like each other that much and are there just for the money, not to help out their 'blood'.
They def hooked up and that's what made me dislike her. Why try so hard to deny it...
everybody who says they see people throwing missions for family have a lot of faith in these peoples character. more often than not, you see families battle it out for inheritance when someone dies and families are torn apart sadly. Do I think some people will value family over money? Of course. But I do not put it past a few people...especially those who may have a sibling rivalry and want to see who's ultimately "better"
I doubt anyone of these people would screw over a family member on these challenges. It's not worth it really when you think about it.
But then again with some of these people I can see your point.
I think it could go half and half...some of them will be willing to lose to let the 'actual' cast member from RW/RR/FM/A*** win to possibly help them stay longer so they are more relevant and can get cast again, and I could see some actually battling if they don't like each other that much and are there just for the money, not to help out their 'blood'.
Yeah. I think it's ultimately gonna come down with to the relationship of the castmember and their blood and what their intentions being on the show is.
They def hooked up and that's what made me dislike her. Why try so hard to deny it...
everybody who says they see people throwing missions for family have a lot of faith in these peoples character. more often than not, you see families battle it out for inheritance when someone dies and families are torn apart sadly. Do I think some people will value family over money? Of course. But I do not put it past a few people...especially those who may have a sibling rivalry and want to see who's ultimately "better"
I doubt anyone of these people would screw over a family member on these challenges. It's not worth it really when you think about it.
But then again with some of these people I can see your point.
I think it could go half and half...some of them will be willing to lose to let the 'actual' cast member from RW/RR/FM/A*** win to possibly help them stay longer so they are more relevant and can get cast again, and I could see some actually battling if they don't like each other that much and are there just for the money, not to help out their 'blood'.
Yeah. I think it's ultimately gonna come down with to the relationship of the castmember and their blood and what their intentions being on the show is.
Exactly. Some will have no problem with screwing their relative over and some will.
She's soo young. Lol but then again people like Ev/Casey were like only 18 on FM.
but i believe MTV is more strict on age laws right?? even after Priscilla was on BOE. and remember MTV owns the Challenges more now than BMP does.
i really hope V1man can install his input here, since he would have valuable info on age-laws.
"MTV owns the Challenges more now than BMP does" Oh, really? This statement make no sense. MTV is in charge and always has been.
California Labor Law would apply, but one is an adult (age of majority) in the US at 18 in most states, except for Alabama (19), Mississippi (21) and Nebraska (19). So unless Avery's sister's resides in Mississippi, she could independently execute her contract as an adult in any state.
it was regarding how Free Agents was the first challenge to have MTV's on the back of their shirt's. and i remember much talk about budget plans between MTV and Viacom and such. and i was referring to drinking la but then i remembered countries may allow drinking at a younger age. heck the U.S. may change it.... but that's for a different topic.
She's soo young. Lol but then again people like Ev/Casey were like only 18 on FM.
but i believe MTV is more strict on age laws right?? even after Priscilla was on BOE. and remember MTV owns the Challenges more now than BMP does.
i really hope V1man can install his input here, since he would have valuable info on age-laws.
"MTV owns the Challenges more now than BMP does" Oh, really? This statement make no sense. MTV is in charge and always has been.
California Labor Law would apply, but one is an adult (age of majority) in the US at 18 in most states, except for Alabama (19), Mississippi (21) and Nebraska (19). So unless Avery's sister's resides in Mississippi, she could independently execute her contract as an adult in any state.
it was regarding how Free Agents was the first challenge to have MTV's on the back of their shirt's. and i remember much talk about budget plans between MTV and Viacom and such. and i was referring to drinking la but then i remembered countries may allow drinking at a younger age. heck the U.S. may change it.... but that's for a different topic.
I just real that Alicia (Sylvia's Skeleton) was the one who originally auditioned for The Real World and they hinted at Sylvia being her skeleton. When they interviewed Sylvia they liked her more so they went with her instead, leaving Alicia as the skeleton. This explains why Alicia was Salt Team General the entire time she was there.
I just real that Alicia (Sylvia's Skeleton) was the one who originally auditioned for The Real World and they hinted at Sylvia being her skeleton. When they interviewed Sylvia they liked her more so they went with her instead, leaving Alicia as the skeleton. This explains why Alicia was Salt Team General the entire time she was there.
not entirley true. Jason and Bruno and Nicole all also auditioned for the Real World. you can find there cast videos on youtube, except for Nicole cuz she deleted hers.
im confused why MTV would put kenny and evan on their program after they were banned from the show (Exes 1 and Rivals2). It doesnt make anysense if V1 thinks its insulting for woman but yet mtv still airs them out on their program. I do like Kenny and Evan and i hope they are brought back one of these days.
im confused why MTV would put kenny and evan on their program after they were banned from the show (Exes 1 and Rivals2). It doesnt make anysense if V1 thinks its insulting for woman but yet mtv still airs them out on their program. I do like Kenny and Evan and i hope they are brought back one of these days.
Kenny & Evan are NOT someone any woman should ever want to see again. To say that you like them saddens me...
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
That's actually not a bad idea...
I think someone mentioned it before that they should have the bloolines compete in pairs in the first challenge like Bananas-Hannah, Cooke-Sister, Emily-Sister etc and then whoever wins are captains of their respective teams. So Emily-Sister win. Emily chooses Bananas which means her sister gets Hannah. Her sister chooses Cooke so Emily gets Cooke's sister. I think that would be the best way so you don't have Emily, Cooke, Bananas and the other alumni dominating.
If Cooke is on the same challenge as Emily again, that sucks for her. She could have easily won the past two challenges with no Emily, provided her partner in exes wasn't ***. But with that said, if it's a solo challenge, and Cooke can avoid any physical eliminations against Emily, which is likely since Emily ain't getting voted into an elimination, she'll likely win it. If not for that horrendous dead body pickup part of the rivals 2 final, Cooke would have dragged Cara Maria to a win. I think Cooke would have destroyed the past 2 finals.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
im confused why MTV would put kenny and evan on their program after they were banned from the show (Exes 1 and Rivals2). It doesnt make anysense if V1 thinks its insulting for woman but yet mtv still airs them out on their program. I do like Kenny and Evan and i hope they are brought back one of these days.
Perhaps you should consider that their lack of participation as challenge cast members might have been part of the Oct.2012 negotiated settlement in the case. Since the settlement is sealed, I obviously can't confirm that. It might also be that it was only as cast members that they were banned, not in any other role like hosting. Neither one was a party to the settlement.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
That's actually not a bad idea...
I like this idea. Can someone show this to MTV? This would be great.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
That's actually not a bad idea...
I like this idea. Can someone show this to MTV? This would be great.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
I actually said something similar earlier in this thread. It's a good idea and I hope they do it.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
That's actually not a bad idea...
I like this idea. Can someone show this to MTV? This would be great.
V1Man...
I do wish someone from BMP could be interviewed so all of you could see the level of detail that goes into planning a challenge. It's really quite remarkable. They have pages of format options. This idea is not new; how to build the largest possible audience given the available players is always part of the process.
BTW, if it shows up at vevmo, BMP will read it. I'm sure that is one way they learned of Trey's tweet, now removed, announcing "bloodlines."
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
That's true, I doubt viewers would want a team of randoms to win. Splitting alumni and experience both ways would be best if they choose to go this route with this theme.
I doubt anyone of these people would screw over a family member on these challenges. It's not worth it really when you think about it.
But then again with some of these people I can see your point.
I think it could go half and half...some of them will be willing to lose to let the 'actual' cast member from RW/RR/FM/A*** win to possibly help them stay longer so they are more relevant and can get cast again, and I could see some actually battling if they don't like each other that much and are there just for the money, not to help out their 'blood'.
Yeah. I think it's ultimately gonna come down with to the relationship of the castmember and their blood and what their intentions being on the show is.
Exactly. Some will have no problem with screwing their relative over and some will.
it was regarding how Free Agents was the first challenge to have MTV's on the back of their shirt's. and i remember much talk about budget plans between MTV and Viacom and such. and i was referring to drinking la but then i remembered countries may allow drinking at a younger age. heck the U.S. may change it.... but that's for a different topic.
it was regarding how Free Agents was the first challenge to have MTV's on the back of their shirt's. and i remember much talk about budget plans between MTV and Viacom and such. and i was referring to drinking la but then i remembered countries may allow drinking at a younger age. heck the U.S. may change it.... but that's for a different topic.
If it is bloodline I want Zach and one of his sisters so they can teach him how to treat people.
I just real that Alicia (Sylvia's Skeleton) was the one who originally auditioned for The Real World and they hinted at Sylvia being her skeleton. When they interviewed Sylvia they liked her more so they went with her instead, leaving Alicia as the skeleton. This explains why Alicia was Salt Team General the entire time she was there.
not entirley true. Jason and Bruno and Nicole all also auditioned for the Real World. you can find there cast videos on youtube, except for Nicole cuz she deleted hers.
Zach's short hair isn't that bad.
Check out @JennaCompono's Tweet: https://twitter.com/JennaCompono/status/582702308972208128?s=09
He is so gross. That beard thing going, that look on his face, gross.
Even seeing his photo, I can hear his voice and it makes me want to cut my ears off.
Eh Zach can stay home.
im confused why MTV would put kenny and evan on their program after they were banned from the show (Exes 1 and Rivals2). It doesnt make anysense if V1 thinks its insulting for woman but yet mtv still airs them out on their program. I do like Kenny and Evan and i hope they are brought back one of these days.
Kenny & Evan are NOT someone any woman should ever want to see again. To say that you like them saddens me...
LOL. Harsh as ever, but I understand where it's coming from.
I couldn't even click that link.
Because they weren't banned at that time as the evidence hadn't become fully clear to MTV.
If they actually do this Bloodlines thing I think the best way would be with two big teams both having alumni and bloodlines on each team. The siblings would just be on opposite teams. For example Nia on one team while her sister on the other. Averey on one team while her sister is on Nias. If they split it Alumni vs Bloodlines who is going to wanna root for these random siblings no oen has ever seen before? Plus they could make the teams more balanced with experience on both sides. I'm just hoping for no pairs.
That's actually not a bad idea...
I think someone mentioned it before that they should have the bloolines compete in pairs in the first challenge like Bananas-Hannah, Cooke-Sister, Emily-Sister etc and then whoever wins are captains of their respective teams. So Emily-Sister win. Emily chooses Bananas which means her sister gets Hannah. Her sister chooses Cooke so Emily gets Cooke's sister. I think that would be the best way so you don't have Emily, Cooke, Bananas and the other alumni dominating.
If Cooke is on the same challenge as Emily again, that sucks for her. She could have easily won the past two challenges with no Emily, provided her partner in exes wasn't ***. But with that said, if it's a solo challenge, and Cooke can avoid any physical eliminations against Emily, which is likely since Emily ain't getting voted into an elimination, she'll likely win it. If not for that horrendous dead body pickup part of the rivals 2 final, Cooke would have dragged Cara Maria to a win. I think Cooke would have destroyed the past 2 finals.
Frank & Cooke for Exes 3!
Uhh, what?
Perhaps you should consider that their lack of participation as challenge cast members might have been part of the Oct.2012 negotiated settlement in the case. Since the settlement is sealed, I obviously can't confirm that. It might also be that it was only as cast members that they were banned, not in any other role like hosting. Neither one was a party to the settlement.
I like this idea. Can someone show this to MTV? This would be great.
V1Man...
I actually said something similar earlier in this thread. It's a good idea and I hope they do it.
I do wish someone from BMP could be interviewed so all of you could see the level of detail that goes into planning a challenge. It's really quite remarkable. They have pages of format options. This idea is not new; how to build the largest possible audience given the available players is always part of the process.
BTW, if it shows up at vevmo, BMP will read it. I'm sure that is one way they learned of Trey's tweet, now removed, announcing "bloodlines."
That's true, I doubt viewers would want a team of randoms to win. Splitting alumni and experience both ways would be best if they choose to go this route with this theme.
Pages