They have to do what is best for the show to succeed. I think Renzi would be a major turnoff to a majority of the fanbase.
Idk, I feel like for every "Who the **** is this guy?" Comment there will be three saying, "That's Dan, he's an OG Champ and he's hilarious!"
You have really bad reads sometimes, this is one of those times lol.
I'm not even a huge fan of Renzi, but he clearly embodies the spirit of why this spinoff even exists. He deserves his shot. He'll prob flop. But I don't care.
First of all, Pairs formats suck 85% of the time. Most of them start out boring as shit where you have all the weaker pairs get voted in and picked off by all the medium and strong pairs afraid to make a move. It makes the first half of the season boring and unwatchable. Latest example: All Stars 5.
Exes also won't work. You have a casting pool from age 35 to 55. A lot of them are in committed relationships. You'll get 1 or 2 entertaining pairs that legitimately hate each other, 2 pairs that get along and kinda become friends, and 10 pairs that can't stand each other but won't make drama because they want to win the money. It will be boring.
Lets get our strategic and social feet wet again with a Team vs Team Challenge! I prefer Champs vs Contenders but Good Guys vs Bad Azzzes works too!
First of all, Pairs formats suck 85% of the time. Most of them start out boring as shit where you have all the weaker pairs get voted in and picked off by all the medium and strong pairs afraid to make a move. It makes the first half of the season boring and unwatchable. Latest example: All Stars 5.
Exes also won't work. You have a casting pool from age 35 to 55. A lot of them are in committed relationships. You'll get 1 or 2 entertaining pairs that legitimately hate each other, 2 pairs that get along and kinda become friends, and 10 pairs that can't stand each other but won't make drama because they want to win the money. It will be boring.
Lets get our strategic and social feet wet again with a Team vs Team Challenge! I prefer Champs vs Contenders but Good Guys vs Bad Azzzes works too!
On 5 didn't the strongest pair get voted in over and over again? Not advocating for pairs but 5 is a bad example. Amber and Fessy are just stupid and play a scared game.
On 5 didn't the strongest pair get voted in over and over again? Not advocating for pairs but 5 is a bad example. Amber and Fessy are just stupid and play a scared game.
Sacrificing a bunch of layups against a socially disconnected strong team that has no chance to beat them is two sides of the same coin.
I'm so over pairs. It's boring and uninspired. We need a big team vs big team format, it's been half a decade since the last one!
On 5 didn't the strongest pair get voted in over and over again? Not advocating for pairs but 5 is a bad example. Amber and Fessy are just stupid and play a scared game.
Sacrificing a bunch of layups against a socially disconnected strong team that has no chance to beat them is two sides of the same coin.
I'm so over pairs. It's boring and uninspired. We need a big team vs big team format, it's been half a decade since the last one!
Again...over pairs is fine...no disagreement but the cast voted in the strongest team continously. Amber and Fessy screwed it all up...twice. The pairs format wasn't the issue on 5 other than have guy/guy pairs
Im fine with a team season but we gotta be realistic about what that means. Whenever we get one , it ends up having one team dominate, the same people sent in again and again, a bunch of people just kinda floating until the final, and since production is incompetent, the team with more people will win most of the missions. Personally i think they should try teams of four again but the same problems are there with once you lose two people, your days are numbered.
Im fine with a team season but we gotta be realistic about what that means. Whenever we get one , it ends up having one team dominate, the same people sent in again and again, a bunch of people just kinda floating until the final, and since production is incompetent, the team with more people will win most of the missions. Personally i think they should try teams of four again but the same problems are there with once you lose two people, your days are numbered.
Teams almost always had the same people sent in over and over again...we still want a team season knowing that.
Cutthroat worked fine in terms of numbers and who won missions. Just say the same person can't be voted in back to back. G3 was really the only season that numbers were the main reason a team kept losing...and the vets won even when production tried to hand the rookies a win lol
Im fine with a team season but we gotta be realistic about what that means. Whenever we get one , it ends up having one team dominate, the same people sent in again and again, a bunch of people just kinda floating until the final, and since production is incompetent, the team with more people will win most of the missions. Personally i think they should try teams of four again but the same problems are there with once you lose two people, your days are numbered.
The team switch format needs to return with it. Maybe the relic, too? I think that would spice things up and keep politics interesting.
Team vs Team season works best if the eliminations are Team vs Team. Winning the daily should add money to the team's prize pot and give the winning team the choice of who's going against who for the elimination. Relic should come back. No back-to-back eliminations. You win the elim, you're safe for the next one.
On 5 didn't the strongest pair get voted in over and over again? Not advocating for pairs but 5 is a bad example. Amber and Fessy are just stupid and play a scared game.
Sacrificing a bunch of layups against a socially disconnected strong team that has no chance to beat them is two sides of the same coin.
I'm so over pairs. It's boring and uninspired. We need a big team vs big team format, it's been half a decade since the last one!
Again...over pairs is fine...no disagreement but the cast voted in the strongest team continously. Amber and Fessy screwed it all up...twice. The pairs format wasn't the issue on 5 other than have guy/guy pairs
yeah 5 proved how dumb the winners of the first few missions were - Beth/Jonna, Aneesa/Ashley, & Kellyanne/Sylvia never should have been thrown in, made no sense whatsoever.
We are just overdue for what season one should have been - a throwback to the old team challenge days - Gauntlet or Inferno style. They need this plus new random returns for season 6. And as last season proved - less of the "new crowd" - they added nothing.
I want a team season so bad but they have to learn the art of sitting people out so that it's fair. I know they are really incompetent but that is just so basic.
The Ruins is a Top 5 format. If the Challengers weren't absolutely pathetic and JEK weren't toxic monsters poisoning the season, that could've been an amazing season.
Run that format back. Except the whole winning team is in deliberation and the relic for elimination winner.
I know they'll never not go individual but I crave 8 episodes of a strategic and socially rich team vs team season!
I'd love for peacekeeper22 to cuss somebody out
Would yall rather have Sophia or Amber on this?
You're vastly overestimating how many people care about championships back before people could be eliminated.
darling you must open your ears wider and allow the screams for Elka flow through you like a river. She's wanted by all
sophia. Amber can go back on the flagship
Would yall rather have Tori or Amber on this?
Depends on the rest of the cast.
I'm not even a huge fan of Renzi, but he clearly embodies the spirit of why this spinoff even exists. He deserves his shot. He'll prob flop. But I don't care.
I've tried so hard, he won't do it.
I'm scared to angering PK they are so sweet. The rest of yall could learn to be more kinda like them
Is Beggy interested?
I hope not. Unless it's exes and he's partnered with Susie.
Piggy, Belou, Genesis, Elka, Sharon, Cynthia, Flora, Beth, Heather B, Julie, Melissa, Ruthie, Amaya, Coral, Jillian, Angela, Ellen, Cooke, Sophia, Tara, Roni, Susie, Holly B, Holly S, Pua debut
Ayanna ready to make ha comeback.
Two of the biggest OG men personalities of the first 10 seasons and you're no on both of them?
I really, really, really hope they don't do Exes.
First of all, Pairs formats suck 85% of the time. Most of them start out boring as shit where you have all the weaker pairs get voted in and picked off by all the medium and strong pairs afraid to make a move. It makes the first half of the season boring and unwatchable. Latest example: All Stars 5.
Exes also won't work. You have a casting pool from age 35 to 55. A lot of them are in committed relationships. You'll get 1 or 2 entertaining pairs that legitimately hate each other, 2 pairs that get along and kinda become friends, and 10 pairs that can't stand each other but won't make drama because they want to win the money. It will be boring.
Lets get our strategic and social feet wet again with a Team vs Team Challenge! I prefer Champs vs Contenders but Good Guys vs Bad Azzzes works too!
Exes mean Tori & Jordan. No thx.
On 5 didn't the strongest pair get voted in over and over again? Not advocating for pairs but 5 is a bad example. Amber and Fessy are just stupid and play a scared game.
Sacrificing a bunch of layups against a socially disconnected strong team that has no chance to beat them is two sides of the same coin.
I'm so over pairs. It's boring and uninspired. We need a big team vs big team format, it's been half a decade since the last one!
Again...over pairs is fine...no disagreement but the cast voted in the strongest team continously. Amber and Fessy screwed it all up...twice. The pairs format wasn't the issue on 5 other than have guy/guy pairs
Im fine with a team season but we gotta be realistic about what that means. Whenever we get one , it ends up having one team dominate, the same people sent in again and again, a bunch of people just kinda floating until the final, and since production is incompetent, the team with more people will win most of the missions. Personally i think they should try teams of four again but the same problems are there with once you lose two people, your days are numbered.
Teams almost always had the same people sent in over and over again...we still want a team season knowing that.
Cutthroat worked fine in terms of numbers and who won missions. Just say the same person can't be voted in back to back. G3 was really the only season that numbers were the main reason a team kept losing...and the vets won even when production tried to hand the rookies a win lol
The team switch format needs to return with it. Maybe the relic, too? I think that would spice things up and keep politics interesting.
USA 2 was basically what we were asking for.
And, I know we hate skulls, but I always thought that idea worked better in a team-based setting because it forces politics.
It became too easy to get around it in an individual format since everyone didn't rock the boat or knew they'd have up until the last minute for one.
Team vs Team season works best if the eliminations are Team vs Team. Winning the daily should add money to the team's prize pot and give the winning team the choice of who's going against who for the elimination. Relic should come back. No back-to-back eliminations. You win the elim, you're safe for the next one.
yeah 5 proved how dumb the winners of the first few missions were - Beth/Jonna, Aneesa/Ashley, & Kellyanne/Sylvia never should have been thrown in, made no sense whatsoever.
We are just overdue for what season one should have been - a throwback to the old team challenge days - Gauntlet or Inferno style. They need this plus new random returns for season 6. And as last season proved - less of the "new crowd" - they added nothing.
I want a team season so bad but they have to learn the art of sitting people out so that it's fair. I know they are really incompetent but that is just so basic.
The Ruins is a Top 5 format. If the Challengers weren't absolutely pathetic and JEK weren't toxic monsters poisoning the season, that could've been an amazing season.
Run that format back. Except the whole winning team is in deliberation and the relic for elimination winner.
I know they'll never not go individual but I crave 8 episodes of a strategic and socially rich team vs team season!
Minus the Tonya incident Ruins was an AMAZING season with soooo much drama.
Pages