Real World Seattle: Bad Blood - Spoilers Discussion

4693 posts / 0 new
Last post

Mike did take responsibility for his action s though on the aftershow. Jenna NEVER did. and yes you may argue that Mike didn't do it on the actual episode but he eventually admitted he was wrong. Jenna never did. 

He was more concerned with saving face if anything. Its all about how he would come off on TV (as is everything with him) than him actually being apologetic for what he said.

If the shoe was on the other foot, Kass would be all types of "horrible human being" & it would be ZERO sympathy.  It wouldn't be any of this "oh he didn't know any better" bullshit; people are already talking shit about this dude for MISSING HIS SON of all things.

 

Q
Q's picture

Mike can't fight, looks are deceiving ala Talone/Zee

mickeyflo24 wrote:

Mike did take responsibility for his action s though on the aftershow. Jenna NEVER did. and yes you may argue that Mike didn't do it on the actual episode but he eventually admitted he was wrong. Jenna never did. 

He was more concerned with saving face if anything. Its all about how he would come off on TV (as is everything with him) than him actually being apologetic for what he said.If the shoe was on the other foot, Kass would be all types of "horrible human being" & it would be ZERO sympathy.  It wouldn't be any of this "oh he didn't know any better" bullshit; people are already talking shit about this dude for MISSING HIS SON of all things. 

I agree. If Kaissus was the one that said those homophobic things and if that gets shown he wouldn't be a vicim at all. He would've been raked through the coals. 

I think it's kinda similar to the Adam situation back in Vegas 2. Had it been Leroy who was acting the way Adam did noone would've put up with it. And that was proven right when Lerot started breaking dishes and he got snapped on by Nany. She wouldn't have done that shit had it been Adam.

Q
Q's picture

Graphik wrote:

mickeyflo24 wrote:Mike did take responsibility for his action s though on the aftershow. Jenna NEVER did. and yes you may argue that Mike didn't do it on the actual episode but he eventually admitted he was wrong. Jenna never did. 

He was more concerned with saving face if anything. Its all about how he would come off on TV (as is everything with him) than him actually being apologetic for what he said.If the shoe was on the other foot, Kass would be all types of "horrible human being" & it would be ZERO sympathy.  It wouldn't be any of this "oh he didn't know any better" bullshit; people are already talking shit about this dude for MISSING HIS SON of all things. 

I agree. If Kaissus was the one that said those homophobic things and if that gets shown he wouldn't be a vicim at all. He would've been raked through the coals. I think it's kinda similar to the Adam situation back in Vegas 2. Had it been Leroy who was acting the way Adam did noone would've put up with it. And that was proven right when Lerot started breaking dishes and he got snapped on by Nany. She wouldn't have done that shit had it been Adam.

Same with Bruno/Jason, Bruno swung on Sylvia and blew up on V, nothing happens but as soon as Jason went off on Nicole there was a problem, the cast needed therapy sessions and shit. 

Q
Q's picture

Graphik wrote:

mickeyflo24 wrote:Mike did take responsibility for his action s though on the aftershow. Jenna NEVER did. and yes you may argue that Mike didn't do it on the actual episode but he eventually admitted he was wrong. Jenna never did. 

He was more concerned with saving face if anything. Its all about how he would come off on TV (as is everything with him) than him actually being apologetic for what he said.If the shoe was on the other foot, Kass would be all types of "horrible human being" & it would be ZERO sympathy.  It wouldn't be any of this "oh he didn't know any better" bullshit; people are already talking shit about this dude for MISSING HIS SON of all things. 

I agree. If Kaissus was the one that said those homophobic things and if that gets shown he wouldn't be a vicim at all. He would've been raked through the coals. I think it's kinda similar to the Adam situation back in Vegas 2. Had it been Leroy who was acting the way Adam did noone would've put up with it. And that was proven right when Lerot started breaking dishes and he got snapped on by Nany. She wouldn't have done that shit had it been Adam.

Same with Bruno/Jason, Bruno swung on Sylvia and blew up on V, nothing happens but as soon as Jason went off on Nicole there was a problem, the cast needed therapy sessions and shit. 

I'm DEAD @ Mickey saying he think Peter can fight. If he was really about it he would have beat Mike's *** when he didn't return that money. 

Daddy DAF
Anonymous's picture

peter has the same wardrobe as ellen degeneras what you mean he can fight lol he aint fighting shit

I'm sure Peter can fight...a pillow.

I'm sure Peter can fight...a pillow.

and the pillow would whoop that *** Smile

Q
Q's picture

Yassss at y'all roasting ***** Pete like that

Daddy DAF
Anonymous's picture
Q
Q's picture

Omfg what is he doing? does he not have friends?

I'm DEAD @ Mickey saying he think Peter can fight. If he was really about it he would have beat Mike's *** when he didn't return that money. 

Not everybody is going to fight over money. Pick your battles.

Debut Album wrote:

Graphik wrote:

mickeyflo24 wrote:Mike did take responsibility for his action s though on the aftershow. Jenna NEVER did. and yes you may argue that Mike didn't do it on the actual episode but he eventually admitted he was wrong. Jenna never did. 

He was more concerned with saving face if anything. Its all about how he would come off on TV (as is everything with him) than him actually being apologetic for what he said.If the shoe was on the other foot, Kass would be all types of "horrible human being" & it would be ZERO sympathy.  It wouldn't be any of this "oh he didn't know any better" bullshit; people are already talking shit about this dude for MISSING HIS SON of all things. 

I agree. If Kaissus was the one that said those homophobic things and if that gets shown he wouldn't be a vicim at all. He would've been raked through the coals. I think it's kinda similar to the Adam situation back in Vegas 2. Had it been Leroy who was acting the way Adam did noone would've put up with it. And that was proven right when Lerot started breaking dishes and he got snapped on by Nany. She wouldn't have done that shit had it been Adam.

Same with Bruno/Jason, Bruno swung on Sylvia and blew up on V, nothing happens but as soon as Jason went off on Nicole there was a problem, the cast needed therapy sessions and shit. 

If I recall correctly Sylvia called out the b.s as well. 

mickeyflo24 wrote:

Mike did take responsibility for his action s though on the aftershow. Jenna NEVER did. and yes you may argue that Mike didn't do it on the actual episode but he eventually admitted he was wrong. Jenna never did. 

He was more concerned with saving face if anything. Its all about how he would come off on TV (as is everything with him) than him actually being apologetic for what he said.If the shoe was on the other foot, Kass would be all types of "horrible human being" & it would be ZERO sympathy.  It wouldn't be any of this "oh he didn't know any better" bullshit; people are already talking shit about this dude for MISSING HIS SON of all things. 

Of course you're missing the point. Mike eventually apologized and owned up to what he said. He said ignorance isn't an excuse. Much better than Jenna. 

I'm DEAD @ Mickey saying he think Peter can fight. If he was really about it he would have beat Mike's *** when he didn't return that money. 

What I meant to say was the rankings. Peter probably is not the best fighter but would without a doubt whoop Will's and Robbie's are.  K*** maybe not. 

But Witty you even said everyone could be K*** outside of Robbie. I'm only repeating what you said originally. 

Graphik wrote:

mickeyflo24 wrote:Mike did take responsibility for his action s though on the aftershow. Jenna NEVER did. and yes you may argue that Mike didn't do it on the actual episode but he eventually admitted he was wrong. Jenna never did. 

He was more concerned with saving face if anything. Its all about how he would come off on TV (as is everything with him) than him actually being apologetic for what he said.If the shoe was on the other foot, Kass would be all types of "horrible human being" & it would be ZERO sympathy.  It wouldn't be any of this "oh he didn't know any better" bullshit; people are already talking shit about this dude for MISSING HIS SON of all things. 

Of course you're missing the point. Mike eventually apologized and owned up to what he said. He said ignorance isn't an excuse. Much better than Jenna. 

Smh I guess Mickey.

If guys are talking about girls and a white kid says I don't find black girls attractive would that be racist to y'all?

If guys are talking about girls and a white kid says I don't find black girls attractive would that be racist to y'all?

yeah. very ignorant to be honest 

What I meant to say was the rankings. Peter probably is not the best fighter but would without a doubt whoop Will's and Robbie's are.  Kass maybe not. 

But Witty you even said everyone could be Kass outside of Robbie. I'm only repeating what you said originally. 

I lowkey forgot about Peter I don't think him or Robbie can fight out of all the guys. Kass either but I see him clocking those two.

If guys are talking about girls and a white kid says I don't find black girls attractive would that be racist to y'all?

Yes. 

jergatlin5 wrote:

If guys are talking about girls and a white kid says I don't find black girls attractive would that be racist to y'all?

Yes. 

Aight so if they're talking and a black kid says he doesn't find white girls attractive would that be racist?

Aight so if they're talking and a black kid says he doesn't find white girls attractive would that be racist?

Yes. There is a difference than having a preference for dating a particular race and saying you think a certain race is unattractive. I find both views to be ignorant but I can find the preference one slightly understandable.

jergatlin5 wrote:

Aight so if they're talking and a black kid says he doesn't find white girls attractive would that be racist?

Yes. There is a difference than having a preference for dating a particular race and saying you think a certain race is unattractive. I find both views to be ignorant but I can find the preference one slightly understandable.

How could having a sexual preference be ignorant? What would you even say to a person who said they found White/Black etc, girls more attractive and tended to go after them? "You aren't sophisticated in the ways of liking East Asian girls bro don't be ignorant lol what?". 

Why start this mess tbh?? 

Why start this mess tbh?? 

mickeyflo24 wrote:

Why start this mess tbh?? 

That would be prejudice, not racism.  Check up the definitions of both words to understand the difference, if you wish.  There are some great articles out there discussing the meanings of both words. 

Either way, though-- it is very ignorant to say that you would never date an entire race of people, or to say that you don't find people of other races to be attractive.  There are ugly people in every part of this world, and there are pretty people in every part of this world.  Skin color does not equal beauty.  And ignorance is UGLY!

Pages